If you believe, as I do, the 2A is rooted in codifying the ability to take up arms against an oppressive (gun-restricting) government, as had just been done a few years prior, you're out of touch. If you believe in gun ownership for protection, you're going to accidentally shoot your child. If you believe all guns are bad, you're point of view is to be enforced at the business-end of a government-owned gun.
It's all madness. Try not to form a view of the argument from Reddit.
Case in point?
http://www.pewresearch.org/files/old-assets/pdf/gun-control-...
(hint: it's very divided - somewhat by age, but not enough to back up my original point)
The most depressing one to me is the divide between registered voters (slightly pro-gun) and non-registered voters (heavily anti-gun). If you want political change, maybe try voting!