News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by josh2600 on Thursday February 04, 2016 @04:55PM (#11037591)
Given Dropbox's absolutely glacial pace of feature progression, no it would not be easy. I mean, all of dropbox runs off of one set of private keys...

https://www.dropbox.com/en/help/28

Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by fapjacks on Thursday February 04, 2016 @10:38PM (#11039238)
Dropbox works with the NSA to hand over customer data. You are absolutely right that something like this would go over like a turd in a punchbowl at Dropbox HQ.
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by kiwibulldog on Thursday February 04, 2016 @11:18PM (#11039377)
Unlike Google, Microsoft and Slack, Dropbox does have the top, 5 star, EFF rating for protecting your data from the government... I'm not sure what more they could be doing.

Edit to add link to EFF ratings: https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-government-data-reques...

Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by fapjacks on Saturday February 06, 2016 @05:23PM (#11050238)
Are we THAT forgetful? http://kiledjian.com/main/2013/6/7/nsa-is-using-google-faceb...

Dropbox was listed on PRISM documents. Are you kidding me?

Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by msh on Friday February 05, 2016 @01:02AM (#11039813)
They could do client side encryption.
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by clinta on Friday February 05, 2016 @07:54AM (#11041044)
Their profitability depends on being able to dedupe and compress data across all customers. They would need to raise prices significantly to make client side encryption a built in feature.
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by nkuttler on Friday February 05, 2016 @01:39AM (#11039952)
You trust the end users to back up their private keys?
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by __david__ on Friday February 05, 2016 @02:40AM (#11040133)
I don't care what other people do. I want client side encryption!
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by reitanqild on Friday February 05, 2016 @11:18AM (#11042386)
Then use tarsnap already. Bonus: it is owned by our own cperciva.

tarsnap is nerdish, secure and reasonably priced for what it provides IIRC. Haven't used it though but expect someone would have yelled out here if it was bad. (In fact the only one I've seen bashing it was patio11, -because it was too cheap and too nerdish.)

Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by cperciva on Saturday February 06, 2016 @08:35AM (#11047701)
tptacek also complains that tarsnap is too nerdish. :-)
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by jabl on Friday February 05, 2016 @05:35AM (#11040617)
At least on Linux/OSX/Android, you can use encfs to have a encrypted directory tree.
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by msh on Friday February 05, 2016 @03:46AM (#11040326)
Spideroak can do it without private keys to back up.
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by reitanqild on Friday February 05, 2016 @11:19AM (#11042394)
Thanks for adding facts. Do they still have that questionable(?) politician on the board?
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by rmc on Friday February 05, 2016 @04:31AM (#11040454)
As the recent Schrems case in the CJEU said, any data held in the USA is no secure.
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by tptacek on Saturday February 06, 2016 @10:18PM (#11051424)
By all means, just make stuff up. You've come to the right venue.