News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by nkuttler on Friday February 05, 2016 @01:39AM (#11039952)
You trust the end users to back up their private keys?
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by __david__ on Friday February 05, 2016 @02:40AM (#11040133)
I don't care what other people do. I want client side encryption!
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by reitanqild on Friday February 05, 2016 @11:18AM (#11042386)
Then use tarsnap already. Bonus: it is owned by our own cperciva.

tarsnap is nerdish, secure and reasonably priced for what it provides IIRC. Haven't used it though but expect someone would have yelled out here if it was bad. (In fact the only one I've seen bashing it was patio11, -because it was too cheap and too nerdish.)

Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by cperciva on Saturday February 06, 2016 @08:35AM (#11047701)
tptacek also complains that tarsnap is too nerdish. :-)
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by jabl on Friday February 05, 2016 @05:35AM (#11040617)
At least on Linux/OSX/Android, you can use encfs to have a encrypted directory tree.
Re:Introducing the Keybase filesystem by msh on Friday February 05, 2016 @03:46AM (#11040326)
Spideroak can do it without private keys to back up.