Re:Britain to Foreign Workers: If You Don't Make $50,000 a Y...
by stuxnet79 on Thursday February 04, 2016 @03:50PM
(#11037109)
NHS can't afford to pay it's doctors rockstar wages because it is arguably the most efficient healthcare system on the planet.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Britain to Foreign Workers: If You Don't Make $50,000 a Y...
by DrScump on Thursday February 04, 2016 @09:53PM
(#11039088)
I can't see how "NHS can't afford to pay it's (sic) doctors rockstar wages" follows from "it is arguably the most efficient healthcare system on the planet". Why are these mutually exclusive?
Re:Britain to Foreign Workers: If You Don't Make $50,000 a Y...
by stuxnet79 on Friday February 05, 2016 @08:46AM
(#11041296)
Efficient in the sense that you get more bang for your buck healthcare wise in the UK than you would get from the US or any other country that follows the US model. NHS is already barely able to make ends meet right now and would basically flop as a system if it had to match US wages for doctors.
US healthcare in comparison to UK healthcare is bloated, costly and inefficient in the sense that a whole lot of money is spent with nothing to show of it (patients are not getting any better services).
For more information on this read "The Healing of America: A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper, and Fairer Health Care"
Also is the use of 'sic' really necessary? I find it to be pretentious.