Re:Go, Marvin Minsky, and the Chasm That AI Hasn’t yet Crossed
by argonaut on Tuesday February 02, 2016 @09:11PM
(#11024279)
How is that overfitting? That term is not applicable in this context.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Go, Marvin Minsky, and the Chasm That AI Hasn’t yet Crossed
by shas3 on Tuesday February 02, 2016 @11:59PM
(#11024790)
It does: like an overfit (verb) model, Deep Blue and Jeopardy Watson don't generalize well to other problems.
Re:Go, Marvin Minsky, and the Chasm That AI Hasn’t yet Crossed
by argonaut on Wednesday February 03, 2016 @02:41AM
(#11025272)
Overfitting concerns itself with generalization to out of training data on the same task.
I think the term you are looking for is that it's too domain-specific. Or "it uses too much feature engineering and domain-specific engineering."
Re:Go, Marvin Minsky, and the Chasm That AI Hasn’t yet Crossed
by shas3 on Wednesday February 03, 2016 @10:06AM
(#11026786)
I see quotes to use it as an analogy. I'm not claiming that their algorithm over fits. It is just another way of saying the system is too specific and optimized to chess to be generalizable.