Re:Project Natick: Microsoft's Underwater Data Center
by cududa on Sunday January 31, 2016 @09:11PM
(#11009224)
Well Seattle is right by the sea, so..
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Project Natick: Microsoft's Underwater Data Center
by hueving on Sunday January 31, 2016 @10:10PM
(#11009437)
Microsoft isn't in Seattle, so...
Re:Project Natick: Microsoft's Underwater Data Center
by cududa on Sunday January 31, 2016 @10:20PM
(#11009493)
I'm aware - I worked there. But it's pretty close - certainly not far enough to be oblivious to the ocean
Re:Project Natick: Microsoft's Underwater Data Center
by cldellow on Sunday January 31, 2016 @10:19PM
(#11009489)
It's a 20 minute drive from Redmond to Seattle.
It's a 3 hour drive from Seattle to the ocean.
Re:Project Natick: Microsoft's Underwater Data Center
by remarkEon on Sunday January 31, 2016 @10:56PM
(#11009663)
I suppose it would depend on what you'd qualify as "the ocean". I lived in Seattle for 4.5 years, and while I don't consider Elliot Bay[1] to be "the ocean" per se, it's pretty close - and you have all the corrosion problems and general exposure to the elements that you'd get, which I think was the original point of the comparison in this thread.
Re:Project Natick: Microsoft's Underwater Data Center
by nwhybrid on Sunday January 31, 2016 @10:28PM
(#11009522)
Ok someone has never been to Seattle it seems. It's not a 3 hour drive to the ocean.
Re:Project Natick: Microsoft's Underwater Data Center
by foota on Sunday January 31, 2016 @11:33PM
(#11009788)
It's amazing that the drive to the Northern part of the Olympia Peninsula is so long, Bellingham which looks much farther is around a half hour closer.
Re:Project Natick: Microsoft's Underwater Data Center
by tiff_seattle on Sunday January 31, 2016 @10:45PM
(#11009612)
With minimal traffic, it is: https://tinyurl.com/zbkp89q