News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:San Francisco Bubble by dawnbreez on Friday January 29, 2016 @12:53PM (#10996950)
The reason free markets are great isn't their speed (though they are often faster than your average politician); it's the self-regulating nature of it. You don't have to tell people to stop buying overly-expensive food, nor do you have to tell the food stores to cut their prices. Over time, they each realize that the higher price isn't working; the customer buys elsewhere (either across the street or aceoss the state), and the grocery store lowers its prices until people decide that it's worth it again.

Companies don't have to be told to improve, either, not when their competitors are improving and eating market space. At least, that's how it works in theory. A lot of industries have turned into demilitarized zones, both sides opposed but neither making a move. Telecom is the best example of how bad this gets.

Re:San Francisco Bubble by pjlegato on Friday January 29, 2016 @04:14PM (#10998553)
Telcos are actually a great example of how the free market (eventually) routes around incumbents who fail to satisfy market demand.

The telcos have stalled residential broadband for decades, leaving most of the US stuck with early 2000s-level cable modems or DSL. None of them will make a move.

So what happened? https://fiber.google.com/about/

Re:San Francisco Bubble by angelbob on Saturday January 30, 2016 @07:20PM (#11004524)
I wish you were right. I'm in Fremont, a half hour from Mountain View and Google. Google Fiber's still not available.
Re:San Francisco Bubble by acchow on Friday January 29, 2016 @01:30PM (#10997300)
> Companies don't have to be told to improve, either, not when their competitors are improving and eating market space. At least, that's how it works in theory. A lot of industries have turned into demilitarized zones, both sides opposed but neither making a move. Telecom is the best example of how bad this gets.

And yet even telecoms have invested huge swaths of capital to get us to 3G then LTE.

Re:San Francisco Bubble by dawnbreez on Saturday January 30, 2016 @10:21AM (#11002105)
The problem is that they basically habe a nonaggression pact. You'll find either AT&T or T-Mobile in any given area; not both. This means that, if you don't like their prices or their service...well, what are you gonna do? Build your own telco?

This lack of competition leads to a sort of mini-monopoly, meaning that they basically have no reason to not jack up prices.

That is, until Google comes along and kicks them out, as another comment points out.

Re:San Francisco Bubble by bpchaps on Friday January 29, 2016 @02:03PM (#10997605)
Yeah, okay. Until you hear stories like this.....

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131012/02124724852/decad...