Re:Goldman Sachs and the $580M Black Hole (2012)
by qaq on Friday January 29, 2016 @09:33AM
(#10995343)
The biggest take away is find a partner appropriate for the deal size you are doing. A smaller IB for which 5m fee would actually matter would have being a smarter bet.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Goldman Sachs and the $580M Black Hole (2012)
by gmarx on Friday January 29, 2016 @11:48AM
(#10996309)
This is true for many services you buy from other companies. The reputation of a giant is likely based on the top people in that company and sometimes based on the top people who were in that company years ago. Unless you are also a giant company you are probably getting junior people brought on to feed the pyramid. If you can find a smaller practice with smart people you will usually be better off
Re:Goldman Sachs and the $580M Black Hole (2012)
by at5 on Friday January 29, 2016 @11:39AM
(#10996239)
100%. Many boards think that by getting Goldman or Morgan you're covering your ass. They don't realize that unless you're atleast $1BN in size they really are not incentivized to do a thorough job. Why? Because M&A deals are priced off a % fee grid (50bps to ~2% depending on the deal). 2% on 580 doesn't shift the dial for Goldman.