Re:Toto - Heroku blogging in 10 seconds & 230 LOC
by cloudhead on Wednesday February 03, 2010 @01:57PM
(#1098520)
Yea, I evaluated jekyll, scanty, webby, aerial and a couple of other similar engines before making this, but none of them really worked the way I wanted.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Toto - Heroku blogging in 10 seconds & 230 LOC
by spooneybarger on Wednesday February 03, 2010 @02:00PM
(#1098529)
what about how jekyll works made you want to do something else?
Re:Toto - Heroku blogging in 10 seconds & 230 LOC
by cloudhead on Wednesday February 03, 2010 @02:09PM
(#1098543)
Two reasons mainly:
- I wanted it to play well with Heroku, Jekyll generates files, which is incompatible with the read-only filesystem of heroku.
- I wanted something really simple, Jekyll's become a little too heavy for what should be a simple task.
Re:Toto - Heroku blogging in 10 seconds & 230 LOC
by stanleydrew on Wednesday February 03, 2010 @02:29PM
(#1098591)
I agree that jekyll's getting a bit heavy, although I'm definitely not even taking full advantage of all it's features. I still don't know much about Heroku though, and this might be a good way to try it out.
Re:Toto - Heroku blogging in 10 seconds & 230 LOC
by spooneybarger on Wednesday February 03, 2010 @02:11PM
(#1098553)
i cant seem to reply to your reply...
as to your point 1, have you seen: