cloudhead
cloudhead on Hacker News
Too bad there's no way to actually use it
Did you start the silo book? Loved the show as well.
Did you have to look or review any of the code produced, to get the performance/capabilities that you wanted, or were all interactions through CC? In other words, did you hit any walls with the pure agentic workflow?
Posted by
cloudhead on Friday April 17, 2026 @05:28AM
from the community.computer dept.
Posted by
cloudhead on Monday February 16, 2026 @06:32AM
from the radiant.computer dept.
Can you elaborate? Zig has a lot of traction already.
Uhm yeah, a touch screen is not a keyboard. It will never be one.
So 5000 IU is the recommended amount?
How does this work? Files need to reference other files eg. for calling functions from other modules, which means semantic analysis needs both files in memory to check the types. This is especially complicated with mutual recursion across modules (separate compilation doesn't apply here). If you're building a language like C where everything requires forward declarations, then maybe, but anything more modern seems difficult.
I think you’re right with regards to the intention — but I’ve personally not experienced the case of an std lib being too big — good examples of “the right size” would be Go or Zig.
The fact that you either need a third party dependency or a large amount of boilerplate just to get decent error reporting, points to an issue in the language or std library design.
I've started also dropping `thiserror` when building libraries, as I don't want upstream users of my libraries to incur this additional dependency, but it's a pain.
False dichotomy.. if reliability matters, you have to invest in both. Fault tolerance is not a replacement for correctness.
What’s wrong with your keyboard haha
For sure, and I guess that's kind of my point -- if the OP says local coding models are now good enough, then it's probably because he's using things that are towards the middle of the distribution.
In my experience the latest models (Opus 4.5, GPT 5.2) Are _just_ starting to keep up with the problems I'm throwing at them, and I really wish they did a better job, so I think we're still 1-2 years away from local models not wasting developer time outside of CRUD web apps.
And your point is? Shipping garbage is better than not shipping anything?
https://radiant.computerA new vertically integrated operating system and computer for the next generation.
Working on the native language and OS currently!
Looks interesting, but I self host so it would have to work with plain Git URLs.
> LLMs deserve a 100x better browser.
Hold on, why can't humans have a 100x better browser?
Nice, this aligns with what we're working on at
https://radiant.computer -- it would be nice to gather all such projects in one place.
I’m working on Radiant Computer.
https://radiant.computer
It’s a new kind of computer that attempts to part from the unix heritage and offer something really accessible and modern.
Yes, good idea — I know about Rebol but haven’t looked at it from that angle.
Thanks for your comment.
I do think Linux is good enough (it's what I use daily), but I'm a software person. I don't think linux is good enough for the average person or for kids learning how to use computers. It's hard to use and quite unfriendly, even distros like Ubuntu.
The second point is simply that I think we can do better. Progress does not stop here, but most people are afraid to take on big problems, so they never try.
In five years time, "I want AI" will be 99% of computer users. Sure, neural nets are opaque, but having an AI assistant running locally and helping you with your tasks does not make your computer any harder to understand.