News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by tptacek on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @04:56PM (#10983816)
I'm not opposed to free education. I'm certain free education is better than $150k education. But gating stable employment on 4-year degrees is problematic for reasons other than tuition costs, and, equally important to this thread, startups probably can't make college free, but they might be able to replace college for a pretty big set of white collar jobs.
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by fscherer on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @06:22PM (#10984413)
I think colleges should educate people and not only train them for a job. This is only really viable with free education and much harder to do with the alternatives which are discussed right now.
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by waterlesscloud on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @06:40PM (#10984531)
Sure, but training them for an economically viable life is certainly higher priority than a so-called well-rounded education.
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by fscherer on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @07:27PM (#10984796)
Probably yes but I feel that general education is, especially in this community, a little undervalued. Democracy fundamentally depends on its population being educated and in more ways than just STEM. Better socioeconomic decisions are made if more voters are educated in areas other than programming (figuratively) and this is only achievable if this type of education is a viable path for young people, for example through tuition-free universities
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by JoBrad on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @08:59PM (#10985511)
We should better fund community colleges, and make pursuing a technical degree free. That is the degree whose goal is a job.

For a BA, MA, etc, the goal shouldn't be a job, but the pursuit of knowledge. Part of that is the value in knowledge itself, but it also gives you a broader skill set that can be applied to many kinds of jobs, where a technical degree is much more specialized.

Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by superuser2 on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @09:37PM (#10985731)
Employers who require trained workers should bear the responsibility for training them (and control the process of doing so).

On the other hand the public has an interest in liberally educated neighbors and voters.

Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by andrepd on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @09:00PM (#10985516)
I would argue against that.
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by jacobush on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @07:01PM (#10984639)
I agree, otherwise the proles might become too uppity.
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by samcodes on Thursday January 28, 2016 @03:00AM (#10986980)
Thank you so much for teaching me the term "proles."
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by jacobush on Thursday January 28, 2016 @03:49AM (#10987143)
Haha, it's so useful. :)
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by pc86 on Thursday January 28, 2016 @10:36AM (#10988764)
> I'm certain free education is better than $150k education.

Is this really the case? Sure for identical education free is better than non-free, but I know even in software development if you're applying for jobs in the US and your degree is from Poland there are places that won't interview you, let alone hire you.

Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by Fargren on Thursday January 28, 2016 @11:53AM (#10989323)
In Argentina, the University of Buenos Aires is free and I know plenty of people who went from there to Google. They got better scores than Harvard in ACM last year. So yeah, free education can be as good in quality as paid education, at least in some cases.
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by fijal on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @05:01PM (#10983857)
sorry, misunderstood you, apologies.
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income by intended on Friday January 29, 2016 @01:13AM (#10993794)
Largely - It's not an education problem. It's a jobs, discrimination, and "qualification creep" problem.