Re:Request For Research: Basic Income
by waterlesscloud on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @06:40PM
(#10984531)
Sure, but training them for an economically viable life is certainly higher priority than a so-called well-rounded education.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income
by fscherer on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @07:27PM
(#10984796)
Probably yes but I feel that general education is, especially in this community, a little undervalued. Democracy fundamentally depends on its population being educated and in more ways than just STEM. Better socioeconomic decisions are made if more voters are educated in areas other than programming (figuratively) and this is only achievable if this type of education is a viable path for young people, for example through tuition-free universities
We should better fund community colleges, and make pursuing a technical degree free. That is the degree whose goal is a job.
For a BA, MA, etc, the goal shouldn't be a job, but the pursuit of knowledge. Part of that is the value in knowledge itself, but it also gives you a broader skill set that can be applied to many kinds of jobs, where a technical degree is much more specialized.
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income
by superuser2 on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @09:37PM
(#10985731)
Employers who require trained workers should bear the responsibility for training them (and control the process of doing so).
On the other hand the public has an interest in liberally educated neighbors and voters.
I would argue against that.
Re:Request For Research: Basic Income
by jacobush on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @07:01PM
(#10984639)
I agree, otherwise the proles might become too uppity.
Thank you so much for teaching me the term "proles."