News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:More evidence emerges for 'transmissible Alzheimer's' theory by pc2g4d on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @05:43PM (#10976832)
But what about the CJD controls that didn't receive transplants derived from cadaver tissue? Those didn't show the same rate of Alzheimers-like plaques, if I understood the report correctly.
Re:More evidence emerges for 'transmissible Alzheimer's' theory by alexholehouse on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @06:31PM (#10977092)
The CJD controls had sporadic (sCJD), not variant CJD (vCJD) (whether or not these are distinct diseases is certainly an open question - I'm more trying to make the point that there are a lot of variables up in the air, and while it's a striking relationship there are other equally striking relationships one could draw).
Re:More evidence emerges for 'transmissible Alzheimer's' theory by pc2g4d on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @02:20PM (#10982323)
A good note of caution for any study.