News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Barack Obama: Why we must rethink solitary confinement by VLM on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @08:11AM (#10973202)
It might be a cultural thing to average levels of criminality from the top and bottom. Much like Americans believe some things to be binary or some things to be a spectrum, perhaps in Denmark criminality is binary, either you are and they throw the average sized book at all of them, or you aren't.

As an anecdote this is the same Denmark that went insane over a retailer selling Marmite, costing many thousands of euro in fines and punishments. That would fit the pattern of once the binary switch flips from non-criminal to criminal, a medium sized book is thrown at all miscreants.

Another possible anecdote is I know their neighbors, and probably the Danes also, punish drunken driving similar to how attempted murder is treated in the US. That would also fit the theory.

Re:Barack Obama: Why we must rethink solitary confinement by ThomPete on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @08:15AM (#10973214)
What do you mean by similar to how attempted murder is treated in the US and what US state are you talking about?

Drunk driving means first getting your drivers card taken if you have too much alcohol in your blod but it requires a lot.

And I am not sure what you mean punishment wise. Care to elaborate?

Re:Barack Obama: Why we must rethink solitary confinement by varjag on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @09:02AM (#10973385)
Drunken driving is essentially an attempted manslaughter, but Scandinavian treatment of it is fairly lenient. In most cases you get away with a huge fine or a short prison term.
Re:Barack Obama: Why we must rethink solitary confinement by ryanlol on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @09:15PM (#10977780)
That's not true in the slightest, drunken driving laws don't measure the drivers impairment but BAC.

And in any case, attempt implies intent.

Re:Barack Obama: Why we must rethink solitary confinement by varjag on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @03:37AM (#10978954)
> That's not true in the slightest, drunken driving laws don't measure the drivers impairment but BAC.

They measure the impairment and BAC is an instrument to that. Otherwise it would be of no interest. There used to be other impairment tests, like walking the line, before breath testers became commonplace.

> And in any case, attempt implies intent.

As manslaughter is an unintentional killing, I thought the metaphor was fairly obvious.

You know drunk drivers are prone to committing manslaughter other variables being equal, you do it anyway: well that's an attempt. Rationale behind it is irrelevant, just like noone cares you needed those money badly when you killed that cashier.

Re:Barack Obama: Why we must rethink solitary confinement by ryanlol on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @09:17PM (#10977783)
> went insane

> costing many thousands of euro

Doesn't add up.