News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by nathanm412 on Monday January 25, 2016 @08:16PM (#10971294)
As a cashier when I was a teenager, I was told to ID and call in anyone with a check # under 500 with the assumption that low check numbers were less likely to be reliable. When I ordered my first book of checks a few years later, I started with # 1550 and was never bothered.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by spydum on Monday January 25, 2016 @09:32PM (#10971521)
as recently as last year when opening another checking account, the bank clerk told me to start my check numbers at atleast 500 (you can specify when ordering checks). I asked her why, and that was also the same reason given. I laughed at the silliness of the idea, but took her advice anyways.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by xupybd on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @12:02AM (#10971896)
Wow what country still uses cheques? Most stores won't take them anymore, here in New Zealand.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by mkingston on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @05:58AM (#10972807)
Unsure if it's totally related to cheque acceptance, but as I understand it NZ fares much better in the card payments realm because of EFTPOS [1] adoption. EFTPOS in NZ is independent of MasterCard/Visa/other credit card companies (but processes transactions for them). For a very long time in NZ bank-issued debit cards on the EFTPOS network have required PIN identification. The cost to a merchant of accepting a bank-issued (read: not MasterCard/Visa/Amex/Diners etc.) debit card on the NZ EFTPOS network is much lower than the cost of accepting a card from one of the big credit card companies. I presume this is because fraud is lower as card-not-present transactions are not allowed. I further presume this is the reason for the far greater rate of acceptance of card payments in NZ than in any other country I've visited.

I thought cheque books were a relic of the past until moving to the UK.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EFTPOS

Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by jib on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @03:54AM (#10972486)
France, the US, among others.

First thing I got when I moved to France (admittedly 12 years ago) was a checkbook. Hadn't heard of them since the 80s in Sweden.

Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by pif on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @04:02AM (#10972503)
In France they are still very common. In particular, checks cannot be refused by members of small-enterprise associations recognized by the fiscal authority.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by andyjohnson0 on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @05:51AM (#10972788)
Still widely used in the the UK for person-to-person transactions. Also for paying single-person businesses like plumbers, painters, etc. Almost all shops and larger businesses refuse to accept them.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by wrboyce on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @06:19AM (#10972853)
Widely? I'm pretty sure that it's one of the least used methods for person to person transactions in the UK. If I had to guess I would put Cash, Faster Payment/BACS, and PayM (the mobile number thing) as more commonly used these days.

I used to pay my milkman with a cheque, but he's online now.

Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by celticninja on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @07:39AM (#10973090)
Grandparents sending money to kids and grandchildren is pro ably their number one use.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by golergka on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @04:34AM (#10972593)
Israel, for long-term monthly payments, mostly rent. Thanks to checks, I pay rent every month, but see my landlord once a year.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by dkersten on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @05:03AM (#10972672)
I pay monthly rent but see my landlord once a year too, but because of internet banking :)
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by golergka on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @05:58AM (#10972804)
If local banking market wasn't under oligopoly of a couple of banks who lock down regulation to forbid any new competitors, it would've happen a long time ago :( Sadly, although the start-up scene here is second only to SV, all of them are targeting world markets first, local just isn't big enough to grow.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by pif on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @04:03AM (#10972506)
Italy as well, even if with more and more restrictions and difficulties.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by ocdtrekkie on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @12:14AM (#10971932)
While no stores take checks here in the US either, it's far more common to use for settling personal debts. Also, many utility bills are most commonly paid by check here as well (for those who don't pay online), as people do not mail cash.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by jessaustin on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @05:50AM (#10972784)
If you haven't been stuck in queue behind a check-writer recently, presumably someone else does your in-store shopping for you. Or maybe you only shop late at night, after the old ladies have gone to bed? That demographic just loves to write checks, and most USA stores accommodate that preference.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by LyndsySimon on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @09:57AM (#10973636)
I can't think of any stores in the US that don't take checks.

Most major retailers (e.g. WalMart) have electronic check acceptance, where they scan the check, print all the details on it, then hand it back to you. It's faster than a debit card, if a bit awkward at first.

Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by morgante on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @02:46AM (#10972339)
> While no stores take checks here in the US either

My mother still routinely pays for nearly everything (groceries, pizza, hardware, etc.) using personal checks. She lives in a small town though.

Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by ocdtrekkie on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @09:21AM (#10973474)
I probably should've specified 'most'.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by marshray on Monday January 25, 2016 @10:45PM (#10971711)
It's not completely silly: a check number under 500 is still highly likely to be a newish account. The test is cheap and has low false positives, so the fact that the it is easily subverted only diminishes its effectiveness but doesn't make it useless.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by mattmcknight on Monday January 25, 2016 @11:55PM (#10971879)
But who's actually rejecting low number checks? It seems more common to see businesses reject accepting checks altogether.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by marshray on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @01:05AM (#10972061)
Yeah, most businesses seem to use a check verification service these days.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by gtk40 on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @08:28AM (#10973257)
I actually had a clerk at a local county court tell me they have to refuse checks if the number was less than 500 (and they already didn't take cards without a 5% fee). Thankfully, I had just ordered new checks and had number 501.