News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Economics Simulation by msellout on Monday January 25, 2016 @12:59AM (#10965833)
I expect you'd find the same dynamics despite adding some positive externalities to the transactions. Depending on how large those externalities are. The nice thing about this example is the code is there for you to modify and test your theories.

A good simulation tries to pare down the system, not getting distracted by other mechanisms that don't change the basic dynamics. For example, it'd be more realistic if the transactions were partially parallelized, but that wouldn't change the analysis much.

Re:Economics Simulation by eru on Monday January 25, 2016 @08:56PM (#10971414)
Please be careful: `positive externalities' are not the same thing as a `non-zero sum game'.
Re:Economics Simulation by msellout on Monday January 25, 2016 @10:56PM (#10971750)
Sure, there could be negative externalities as well. I think the complaint that the transactions were zero-sum implied that "real" economies increase total wealth with most transactions -- positive externalities.
Re:Economics Simulation by eru on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @01:14AM (#10972094)
Still: externalities is different from non-zero sum game..