We use Typed Clojure where I work. To say it's because we "don't want to write Clojure by hand anymore" would be nonsense.
Reading your comments in this thread, I think you'll find out one day that people just have different appetites for different trade-offs and that's really all there is to it. No need to wheedle, condescend, or link Paul Graham essays.
The good news is that a lot of programming skills are fungible, and you (like me) will eventually use things you like more than you expected -- perhaps even more than you like JavaScript. The time you invested won't be wasted.
And if we're talking about emotional investment in technology ... I think that's where most of the JS shaming comments we're seeing on this thread are coming from. People feel a bit threatened by it because it seems like it's eating a lot of things at the moment. They'd be better off following your advice and stop sniping at it and take an interest.
Relax. You're talking about someone's opinion of a programming language.
That said, all of your comments come across as ignorant to me. I don't think you're ignorant, though. I think you know JavaScript really well and like it.
I personally found it unusable on the server until TypeScript became mature enough to use. Have you tried TypeScript or some other static-typed, better-defined language (Flow, Clojure, etc.)?
You may love JavaScript, but there's a good reason Facebook, Google, and Microsoft all find it to be unusable and have created compile-to-JavaScript languages so that their companies can be JavaScript-free someday.