Re:Patreon Gains $30M Series B Funding to Support Growth
by jarcane on Thursday January 21, 2016 @05:48AM
(#10944447)
There are a fair few who've done it in the Youtube space (the infamous Pewdiepie for example), but no, I don't think I know of any Patreon millionaires yet either.
Re:Patreon Gains $30M Series B Funding to Support Growth
by creshal on Thursday January 21, 2016 @06:02AM
(#10944493)
But how sustainable is it? Patreon is rather simple: Users directly pay the artists, however much they want (and Patreon presumably takes some fee).
Youtube makes artists depend on Youtube's subscription and/or advertisement viability, which are largely outside of the control of both artists and consumers. Consumers cannot control where their money ultimately ends up, artists have little planning security.
Re:Patreon Gains $30M Series B Funding to Support Growth
by rplnt on Thursday January 21, 2016 @07:25AM
(#10944749)
> with respect to Patreon
This is important. Typically one would have income from: youtube ads, twitch payout, sponsored content and patreon as a bare minimum. Usually you can add sponsored stuff on instagram/fb/wherever, possibly selling merch. Not to mention the stuff you get without being explicitly asked to endorse it.
Re:Patreon Gains $30M Series B Funding to Support Growth
by rezistik on Thursday January 21, 2016 @12:34AM
(#10943560)
Google says there are currently 2.9 billion internet users, if 1% of them pay you 1 dollar you'd gross 29.1 million dollars, 0.1%, moving the decimals even at just 0.001% could gross you a cool 29 grand. That's really not a bad deal.
This is actually why I like Patreon... the model seems to align more with sustainability.