Why you should not develop apps for Windows 10

Re:Why you should not develop apps for Windows 10 by gelasio on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @01:00PM (#10939990)

Right and last year it was full of Windows 8 horror stories and the years before that it was full of Windows 7 horror stories. In other news - StackOverflow.com is full of programming problems so programming must suck. Point being - /r/sysadmin is where people go to complain and ask questions.

Also, it's empirically verifiable, not an anecdote - that Windows 10 runs all the same apps that I've been able to run for decades on previous versions of Windows without issue. That's what I call rock solid.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why you should not develop apps for Windows 10 by drzaiusapelord on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @01:06PM (#10940036)

As a steady reader or that sub, I can say Enterprise never got on the Win8 bandwagon and the reception to Win7 was a lot more positive. We barely had any issues with our migration to 7 and we did it same year release.

> /r/sysadmin is where people go to complain and ask questions.

That's /r/techsupport. This sub is supposed to be only IT pros. A lot of the issues I see are outside of the "I just need a facebook machine" use cases, so a home user like you may not ever have these issues, but trust me, your IT department sure as hell is having issues.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why you should not develop apps for Windows 10 by gelasio on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @01:48PM (#10940352)

Sorry to disappoint you but I am my IT department and I'm not having any issues...and neither are the IT departments from several companies that I work with.

And as a steady reader of that sub and of the Microsoft multi-sub, I heartily disagree with your observation. Both Win7 and Win8 had loads of "horror stories", just like WinXP before it. People are pretty much going to complain about any new Windows version.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why you should not develop apps for Windows 10 by drzaiusapelord on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @01:58PM (#10940418)

Internal testing with Win8, which is still in the casual testing stage of "lets see what breaks" has like 3+ showstoppers for us and a dozen bad but not showstopper issues. XP to 7 had zero.

That's ignoring the metro apps/store nonsense, which I imagine I would just disable outright when we launch with it.

I guess one could argue that 7 wasn't a "real OS" and just Vista SP3. Still, I think 10 took a lot of gambles and wasn't the refined and less tablety Win8 everyone thought it would be. It clearly was rushed to save MS's image.

[ Parent | on HN ]