News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Desktop Neo – rethinking the desktop interface for produc... by api on Tuesday January 19, 2016 @02:03PM (#10933023)
I think some of that results from the limitations of mobile OSes: everything is tied to an app store, jailed, etc. A mobile device is not a "real computer" not because of any hardware limitation but because the OS is designed for it to be a dumb terminal to access the cloud and consume content and rapid-interaction services.

It maps well to the sorts of things you want to do with a tiny device in your pocket, but it's not suitable for producing anything other than selfies.

This is the hole in the "mobile is the future" argument. Mobile (as it exists today) is only the future if nobody has anything substantial to say or create and we are all just passive consumers.

This is really great desktop UI work and I do hope someone takes a look and gets inspired. It would really be nice if Linux desktop efforts stopped trying to deliver Windows 95 or early versions of MacOSX in 2016 and actually innovated.

Re:Desktop Neo – rethinking the desktop interface for produc... by TheOtherHobbes on Tuesday January 19, 2016 @03:36PM (#10933790)
Also, the screen is smaller.

A lot of tiling problems on the desktop would disappear if monitors were two or three times (or more...) as large on each side and wall-mounted.

Being able to see most of your windows at the same time and work in any one without moving or switching would be revolutionary.

I'd never heard of GUI/10. I don't particularly like the windowing scheme, but I think a ten-way touch interface which flipped between being a multi-pointer and a text keyboard - possibly with a touch point in one corner to switch modes, and not that show/hide thing tablets do now - would be a very interesting thing.

It wasn't practical when 10/GUI was first discussed. It's getting more and more practical now.

>It would really be nice if Linux desktop efforts stopped trying to deliver Windows 95 or early versions of MacOSX in 2016 and actually innovated.

Any innovation has to be much better than current practice. If it's "interesting, but..." it's not enough to get people to switch.