British journalism is fairly independent compared to the US, that said I do notice a lots of 'tamtam' around China in the last couple of weeks.

First the Google announcement (from which rumour has it they've quietly backtracked), then the US arms sale to Taiwan, now this.

Excuse me.

Even though Darth Siddy may own the times, journalistic integrity is a point of pride in Britain. Not everywhere but in the Times, BBC, Guardian etc it certainly is.

He also owns Sky and that's our version of faux news. Sky is rubbish and complains the BBC is 'too big' and a 'monopoly'.

Why? Because the BBC is made of uhm. 'Win'. No adverts and an insane amount of programming for less than a couple of months of Sky (For Sky think Cable). Fantastic.

I'm not sure I understand your point, however the link I posted was Fox News syndicating the Times which as you say, does have journalistic integrity...

I'm sure this document is real, I'm just saying that the fact that the chinese government has been spying on large multi-national corporations across the world is not "news" or even "hacker news".

If one government trying to hack another using gifted USB sticks and cameras isn't hacker news then I really don't know what would be, but if you feel that way there is always the 'flag' option.