> The goverment intervention was absolutely unnecessary. They should have left it to market to judge.

Because that's what I want. Multi-national tech companies going around the world raping economies because "we'll let the market judge".

I'll take regulators please. Slower progress is better sliding backwards.

What if I dont want the regulation as a citizen ? What then ? There are so many issues, so many opinions in the world today. I bet diversity of opinions has never been highest. How should we move as a democracy when everyone has different direction in mind ? Free market is the only solution I can think of.

I acknowledge that not everyone can think/worry about everything. Hence why there would be always need of regulatory/look-out-for-me authorities. However, in this fast paced and diverse world, I propose that they should be opt-in/opt-out.

> What if I dont want the regulation as a citizen ?

You move.

common, it is not even a decision. it is merely a remark that TRAI has observed the misleading campaign by fb.

//The goverment intervention was absolutely unnecessary. They should have left it to market to judge. // Regulation is necessary, we cannot let the giants pollute the open internet