Re:H.265/HEVC vs. H.264/AVC: 50% bit rate savings verified
by cm2187 on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @12:02PM
(#10888572)
Can H265 benefit from Quick Sync hardware acceleration or is it just for H264?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:H.265/HEVC vs. H.264/AVC: 50% bit rate savings verified
by wmf on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @12:14PM
(#10888679)
Skylake has H.265 Quick Sync but previous generations don't.
Re:H.265/HEVC vs. H.264/AVC: 50% bit rate savings verified
by snuxoll on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @01:10PM
(#10889131)
Quick Sync also isn't exactly what I'd call a high-quality encoder, it is useful for things like realtime streaming or screencast recording, but if you are encoding movies or TV shows you will want a "real" HEVC encoder.
Re:H.265/HEVC vs. H.264/AVC: 50% bit rate savings verified
by Veratyr on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @01:51PM
(#10889469)
QuickSync works but it's also worth noting that NVIDIA supports it on their second generation Maxwell cards.
Re:H.265/HEVC vs. H.264/AVC: 50% bit rate savings verified
by paulmd on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @03:20PM
(#10890046)
All Maxwell cards, actually.
GM107, GM204, and GM200 all use a combination of a GPU shader kernel with some CPU assistance. GM206 (in the GTX 960 and 950) implements a newer revision of the PureVideo decoder that allows H265 to be decoded directly on the video engine.
Re:H.265/HEVC vs. H.264/AVC: 50% bit rate savings verified
by wmf on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @04:25PM
(#10890520)
Let's be careful about decoding vs. encoding.
Re:H.265/HEVC vs. H.264/AVC: 50% bit rate savings verified
by p0nce on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @04:14PM
(#10890451)
Has someone compared the results of Quick Sync HEVC encoding with other codecs?
Re:H.265/HEVC vs. H.264/AVC: 50% bit rate savings verified
by willkelleher on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @12:15PM
(#10888682)
On Skylake and newer, yes.