Re:Doctors Unionize to Resist the Medical Machine
by crdoconnor on Sunday January 10, 2016 @08:45PM
(#10878288)
>I mean, the difference between "resist management giving themselves millions while cutting pay for workers" and "price fixing/restrict competition" is just an arbitrary, subjective distinction based on your opinion on how much money people should make.
Who would you prefer was paid more? Your doctor or his non-medical MBA manager?
Re:Doctors Unionize to Resist the Medical Machine
by digbyloftus on Sunday January 10, 2016 @08:52PM
(#10878308)
Whichever leads to the best, most efficient medical industry and provides myself as a consumer with the most value.
Re:Doctors Unionize to Resist the Medical Machine
by lenkite on Wednesday January 13, 2016 @06:45AM
(#10893633)
According to the MBA manager, most efficient = most profits. And most value = more tests and more expenses by the 'consumer'. Looks like you are on with the Kool Aid!
Re:Doctors Unionize to Resist the Medical Machine
by mattmcknight on Sunday January 10, 2016 @08:31PM
(#10878248)
No True Scotsman Fallacy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
Re:Doctors Unionize to Resist the Medical Machine
by CPLX on Sunday January 10, 2016 @09:29PM
(#10878410)
Unions primarily engage in collective bargaining with the employers of their members. The AMA is not a union.
Re:Doctors Unionize to Resist the Medical Machine
by digbyloftus on Sunday January 10, 2016 @09:43PM
(#10878454)
Very likely to be true and I wont disagree! I'm not actually even from the US so I'm unfamiliar with their scope. I disagree with the person I'm replying tos reasoning more than anything. Their objection was of a different nature than yours.
There's also a word for what you're doing. A tautology I think? It seems disingenuous to classify unions based on "good" value capture. It creates a position where unions literally can do no wrong because they'll just stop meeting your definition of union.