Re:Was Mac OS X really the most vulnerable in 2015?
by michaelmrose on Saturday January 09, 2016 @12:55PM
(#10872125)
I would tend to wonder if there was a connection between how many Mac users who don't buy or need malwarebytes or for that matter any 3rd party security software and them wanting to scare people into buying their product.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Was Mac OS X really the most vulnerable in 2015?
by tetrep on Saturday January 09, 2016 @01:51PM
(#10872360)
>I would tend to wonder if there was a connection between how many Mac users who don't buy or need malwarebytes
but this article is critcal of the FUD that is being spread from poorly drawn conclusions about CVE statistics. they're not trying to sell you anything.
Re:Was Mac OS X really the most vulnerable in 2015?
by erdevs on Saturday January 09, 2016 @05:14PM
(#10873107)
Are you sure? This company sells Windows-based security software. While we can't speak definitively to their intent, it is possible to objectively observe that they stand to gain from the impression that Windows is less secure (and more in need of security software like theirs).