Unix has solved for decades? Not really, if we look at the state of adoption of this solution.
We supposedly discovered concrete 2 millennia ago but only adopted it widely 150 years ago.
I wouldn't diss people who actually have a shot at fixing the problem, even though you might not like their solution.
Re:RemixOS – Android for the desktop
by throwaway7767 on Friday January 08, 2016 @08:36AM
(#10864691)
Is there a problem with adoption of SONAMEs?
I use debian all the time, and the major libraries are versioned, and some have more than one version available. Debian is a very common linux distro, and through it, a lot of child distros get it too. AFAIK, RedHat and Fedora do this too.
So, do you mean that the state of adoption is bad for niche linux distros?
Those that do not learn from history is destined to repeat it...
Re:RemixOS – Android for the desktop
by netheril96 on Friday January 08, 2016 @03:48AM
(#10863710)
How does `soname` solve the problems of privilege separation? Like letting the user forbids certain apps from making network connections?
Containers fix a problem that unix has solved for decades.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soname
The problem is the package managers used by most distros getting hung up on there only being a single version number of each package name installed at any one time.
Sort that out, like say how Gobolinux does it, and you do not need containers.
But containers is all the rage on the web these days, so ipso facto is also must be all the rage for desktop Linux.
Back before Gnome and Freedesktop, desktop Linux was a kernel up project. But more and more these days however it is a web down.
Meaning that web people get interested in using the L in LAMP on their desktops, start looking into Gnome/KDE, then get involved in Freedesktop plumbing, and all the while bring their web-isms ("move fast and break stuff" being the most annoying) with them further down the stack.