News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Directed Energy Planetary Defense and Relativistic Probes by jerf on Thursday January 07, 2016 @11:14AM (#10858731)
For the "larger ones" that fitzwatermellow was mentioning, the problem is that your mental model of a big rock starts breaking down. You'd be closer to think "big gravel pile sort of iced together, sort of held together by local gravity because there's nothing else pulling them apart". You shoot a little pulse at the gravel pile and break a piece off and it may simply fly out into space, taking almost all the momentum with it and not affecting the bigger body at all. You apply a big force and you might just send rocks through the pile, with, again, the rocks going through taking most of the momentum you applied with them. (Same for landing a booster on it... there may be nowhere you can boost where the booster doesn't just drill right through and come out the other side.) Hit it harder and it may simply spread out.

The advantage of the gravity towing approach is that gravity affects the entire pile equally; it doesn't matter how tenuously the whole thing is held together. This approach could literally deflect a mountain-sized ball of pure sandbox-grade sand, completely and correctly. That's not something a lot of other approaches can say. It's only downside is that it's miserably slow, so you have to call the problem years in advance.

Re:Directed Energy Planetary Defense and Relativistic Probes by Retric on Thursday January 07, 2016 @02:15PM (#10860017)
The problem with gravity pull is you first need to mach orbits which takes a long time or a lot of delta V. From an energy and complexity perspective your best bet is to impact with a large low mass object like foam or lots of tiny objects like a cloud of sand. The advantage being just about any orbit that gets you there works and high relative velocity's are good. The problem is it's easy to miss.

A solar sail is a solid candidate as you get a large low mass object and 'free' delta V at the same time.

PS: Due to risk of malfunction you likely want to send several ships anyway, while the miss chance is an issue, the cheaper direct approach lets you take more chances.

Re:Directed Energy Planetary Defense and Relativistic Probes by chr1 on Thursday January 07, 2016 @02:28PM (#10860107)
If we break asteroid into smaller pieces wouldn't that be enough? Small pieces won't reach surface of earth and won't cause any damage.

> You shoot a little pulse at the gravel pile and break a piece off and it may simply fly out into space, taking almost all the momentum with it and not affecting the bigger body at all.

this is true for shooting with projectile, but not for vaporizing with laser. With laser you don't apply any external momentum to the asteroid, vapor small debris fly off the asteroid with some momentum because of expanding under heat, and remaining part gets same momentum in the other direction.

Re:Directed Energy Planetary Defense and Relativistic Probes by mabbo on Thursday January 07, 2016 @12:36PM (#10859333)
That is a really intuitive explanation. Thanks.