News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Magic+ by mosselman on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @04:19AM (#10849457)
You completely hit the hammer on the head with both this comment and the parent. I just assume that a big amount of 20-25-ish developers here that make $180.000 are excited at the prospect of having a personal assistant to match their other unreasonable status enhancing purchases.

As if any 'rich person' would spend any amount of time texting some random employee and give them access to his e-mails. If I were rich and would deem myself in need of a PA I would want to know them very well before allowing them access to my personal information and I would expect them to take care of certain things without me having to tell them what to do all the time, let alone text them.

Re:Magic+ by leni536 on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @10:47AM (#10851075)
> You completely hit the hammer on the head

http://dannybaranowski.blogspot.hu/2012/06/idioms-for-idiots...

Re:Magic+ by mosselman on Thursday January 07, 2016 @09:23AM (#10858032)
Point well taken.
Re:Magic+ by sail on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @09:23AM (#10850596)
You are discounting a strong trend: expensive products become commodities.

Plus there are degrees of richness. It's easy to name examples where rich people have been trusting their personal information to faceless entities for years.

> to match their other unreasonable status enhancing purchases

You don't know the purchases of the audience you are referring to.