News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Angular 2 versus React by rimantas on Monday January 04, 2016 @04:06PM (#10838611)

  >  to simply make web markup what it should be: Interactive
I guess I missed the memo. When did it happen that web markup suddenly got a need to be interactive?
Re:Angular 2 versus React by PaybackTony on Monday January 04, 2016 @11:30PM (#10841199)
That's a good point, I think I should of said "Dynamic" for lack of a better word. Interactive, it needn't be.
Re:Angular 2 versus React by mt3ck on Monday January 04, 2016 @11:57PM (#10841296)
I guess I missed the memo. When did it happen that web markup suddenly got a need to be dynamic?
Re:Angular 2 versus React by PaybackTony on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @04:33AM (#10849505)
How often do we list static data in lists anymore? Honest question. It feels like most websites you view anymore are displaying data fed from somewhere that isn't known when you write the markup. As you write markup some is meant to repeat data (lists of posts, reports, etc.). Since this seems to be (to me) happening more than not, markup needs at least some kind of update to accommodate the fact that when writing it, we don't typically write out static markup anymore, though the end result obviously is.

Therefore, Angular, to me, acts like that "dynamic markup" when writing it. It feel more natural to me at this point.