News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Economic Inequality by zo1 on Sunday January 03, 2016 @04:12AM (#10830010)
I'm guessing they would enforce some sort of standard valuation for things like that. Or only when it is possible. So a fledgling business, or shares that aren't publicly tradeable.

Any who, the point is. They will find a way that they will claim is "fair" and consistent but probably has loop holes, and figure out a way to tax capital.

Re:Economic Inequality by funtimes32 on Sunday January 03, 2016 @01:21PM (#10831561)
I'm still not sure how the subjective taxation of risk would work. Nor do I understand how it would be better than the objective taxation of success (i.e., income), especially when it comes to reducing corruption.
Re:Economic Inequality by zo1 on Sunday January 03, 2016 @05:11PM (#10832760)
I have no idea, ask Piketty. I personally don't agree with any taxation at all, just giving you hypotheticals as to how they'd calculate it.