I appreciate the concern about evidence, but please stop fuelling this controversy.

> I appreciate the concern about evidence, but please stop fuelling this controversy.

Quite the opposite. I'm demonstrating there is nothing to be of controversy here. It's pretty clear what occurred here (we do have many of the facts now), yet many want to go off on some wild conspiracy theory. That's fueling controversy purely for the sake of controversy.

With that said - I do believe all the cases have been made, and people will see what they want to see, regardless of the truth.

I get that and I appreciate the intent, but it doesn't matter whether you're burning conspiracy theories or something else, you're still adding fuel to the fire. It's keeping this unseemly argument going, so please stop.

Wouldn't want an unseemly argument to continue... people might gawk.

Truth is exactly what we are essentially searching for here.

Some people have good reason not to trust police reports, as abuse of authority is rife within many districts in the US and UK.

This does not mean that we would disagree with what an official independent report would state because "It has to be a conspiracy", or any other garbage reason -- it just means that we disagree that the outcome of the official police report is necessarily correct, because of the bias police reports can hold.

I think it is fair game to argue against breathless conspiracy theories. It sort of surprising to see in this thread such complete acceptance for the "the police murdered him" narrative while noting the obvious reality, that this is extremely unlikely and the truth is probably much simpler, is actually extremely derided.