News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Purifying Physics: The quest to explain why the “quantum”... by sandworm101 on Thursday December 31, 2015 @10:54AM (#10818067)
>>Quantum mechanics ... allows us to describe elementary particles and fundamental forces, to understand chemical reactions, and to construct lasers, transistors, and computers.

What? So much for purifying the discussion. I know a little about the history of electronics and do not remember any discussion of quantum mechanics by those building the first computers, lasers or transistors. These were rather practical inventions based on easily observable experimentation.

The field of quantum physics certainly allows us to better understand how and why these devices work, and to improve them, but it is not responsible for their existence.

Re:Purifying Physics: The quest to explain why the “quantum”... by AnimalMuppet on Thursday December 31, 2015 @04:09PM (#10819692)
I believe that the first lasers were explicitly based on quantum theory, not on observed macroscopic behavior. There wasn't an experiment that showed something lasing, and then trying to figure out how it worked. Instead, there was "Hey, quantum theory says this might happen - let's try it."
Re:Purifying Physics: The quest to explain why the “quantum”... by swehner on Thursday December 31, 2015 @11:02AM (#10818111)
One explains semiconductors using quantum mechanics.

Computers are constructed with semiconductors.

Re:Purifying Physics: The quest to explain why the “quantum”... by sandworm101 on Thursday December 31, 2015 @11:03AM (#10818122)
That was my point. The OP states that quantum mechanics "allows us to construct", not only describe.
Re:Purifying Physics: The quest to explain why the “quantum”... by typon on Thursday December 31, 2015 @02:38PM (#10819237)
Incorrect. Lets say I grant you that Shockley and Bardeen didn't know anything about quantum mechanics and constructed the first transistor purely due to "observable experimentation" (whatever that means), that idea is completely false today.

I use and write atomistic simulators and semi-classical (finite-element analysis based) simulators to simulate modern FET devices every day as part of my research. I literally use quantum mechanics to write the algorithms behind the simulator (DFT, NEGF in my case). Moreover, if you look at the manual for Synopsys Sentaurus (which is the semi-classical simulator), they have hundreds of pages describing the derivation of their mobility models and structural models from basic quantum theory.

In summary, modern transistors are most definitely constructed taking quantum mechanics into account because without it you wouldn't have transistors functioning at 90nm much less at 14nm. You wouldn't take into account gate-leakage, tunneling, stress, bandstructures, and a host of other properties of modern transistors.

Re:Purifying Physics: The quest to explain why the “quantum”... by sandworm101 on Thursday December 31, 2015 @02:45PM (#10819273)
Read the early experiments with crystals (not wikipedia, which most deals with stuff post-patent). They didn't start with physics textbooks. They started with odd electrical behavior observed in practical experiments.
Re:Purifying Physics: The quest to explain why the “quantum”... by typon on Thursday December 31, 2015 @02:49PM (#10819290)
I already granted you that.