Re:The Problem with Friendly C
by Dylan16807 on Monday December 28, 2015 @05:01AM
(#10800548)
Okay, well since it's my term, I'll make it absolutely clear. The definition is not circular. On those DSPs, plain integer addition is saturating. For x86, so far all evidence points to it being twos-complement.
So the original original quote, "on x86 INT_MAX+1==INT_MIN", is true. As far as I can tell.
So the original original quote, "on x86 INT_MAX+1==INT_MIN", is true. As far as I can tell.