News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mast Brothers obscure the fact that they originally used ... by evanlivingston on Saturday December 19, 2015 @04:13PM (#10764863)
I'm curious how another entity could establish quality of something better than you could yourself?
Re:Mast Brothers obscure the fact that they originally used ... by dv_says on Saturday December 19, 2015 @04:18PM (#10764894)
Independent verification.

For example, this could have helped in [1][2][3] where toxic food products were very mislabeled.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Chinese_milk_scandal

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gutter_oil

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Taiwan_food_scandal

Re:Mast Brothers obscure the fact that they originally used ... by evanlivingston on Saturday December 19, 2015 @07:00PM (#10765433)
I guess I was interested in distinguishing between quality and safety.
Re:Mast Brothers obscure the fact that they originally used ... by JasonCEC on Saturday December 19, 2015 @04:20PM (#10764901)
Quality is a tricky word, but in terms of the appreciation of craft goods, your ability to identify the subtleties that make more higher quality products _better_ is a learned trait.

If your references are wrong, or you miss out on the identification of a nuance, you haven't learned from the experience.

For example, individuals who say "I can't taste the difference between a $30 and $300 bottle of wine" are not _wrong_ - they just lack the formative experiences and education to appreciate the attributes that the more expensive product has.

Thus, if you decide that wine or beer or chocolate was of interest to you, it may be worthwhile to validate and trust your reference products.

Re:Mast Brothers obscure the fact that they originally used ... by HeyLaughingBoy on Saturday December 19, 2015 @07:21PM (#10765487)
HaaS: Hipster as a service.

TaaS: Taster as a service.

I got lots more, including a few choice ones I decided not to post :-)