Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by untog on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @11:09AM
(#10745138)
Sure. But that belief is a genuine worry when you are talking about creating something that'll move a hulk of metal down a road at 70mph.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by lintiness on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @11:28AM
(#10745292)
if we don't have laws currently, we sure as hell need them. i can't imagine letting everybody try their own self-driving software.
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by hospes on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @12:05PM
(#10745587)
Millions of drunk people drive on the roads. People can buy assault weapons, with no training and background checks. People who make self-driving software should be the least of our concerns.
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by dymk on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @01:32PM
(#10746180)
There are laws against drunk driving (and harsh penalties for those that are caught), and you can't buy a firearm without a background check from a dealer (with more states requiring gun show dealers perform background checks now, too).
People building untested self driving cars is an entirely legitimate concern.
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by tim333 on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @11:27PM
(#10749539)
There aren't laws against driving while teenage:
"Nationally, 963,000 teen drivers were involved in police-reported motor vehicle crashes in 2013, which resulted in 383,000 injuries and 2,865 deaths"
I'd worry about that more than the odd geek with a laptop.
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by purplerabbit on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @03:35PM
(#10747117)
Legitimate: yes. Worthy of concern: absolutely not.
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by mikeg8 on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @11:52AM
(#10745485)
I don't think this would help at all because 1) most people are not interested in making their own self-driving car and 2) the small niche who is interested isn't going to worry about following the laws, as Hotz states in the piece.
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by padobson on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @12:06PM
(#10745602)
From the article:
“I live by morals, I don’t live by laws,” Hotz declared in the story. “Laws are something made by assholes.”
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by aries1980 on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @12:29PM
(#10745758)
Indeed, I would have a word with whoever made the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by aiyah4la on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @02:28PM
(#10746593)
This is just nitpicking. He is clearly talking about social laws, not fundamental laws of nature which are clearly different in scope and application.
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by serge2k on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @03:25PM
(#10747039)
So he'll feel morally okay if he kills or cripples someone by being reckless?
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by lintiness on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @12:14PM
(#10745647)
i wonder where he believes laws came from ...
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by knodi123 on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @01:21PM
(#10746108)
From assholes. i.e. other people.
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by krapp on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @12:31PM
(#10745774)
"Assholes", it would appear.
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by webjprgm on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @12:57PM
(#10745942)
This was my first thought when I read the article. There ought to be some test track qualification before allowing a new system to be tested on the public road.
Re:The first person to hack the iPhone is building a self-dr...
by abfan1127 on Wednesday December 16, 2015 @12:37PM
(#10745812)
we already have enough laws. responsibility doesn't change because a computer does some thinking for you. Besides, how many people are actually writing their own self-driving software?