News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Omnisharp – Tools and extensions to work with C# in any e... by wdmeldon on Thursday December 10, 2015 @08:57AM (#10710582)
For me, it's bloat. VS is slow as molasses and has a thousand features I don't need nor want. I also miss the multiselect feature from Sublime.
Re:Omnisharp – Tools and extensions to work with C# in any e... by jongalloway2 on Thursday December 10, 2015 @09:58AM (#10710867)
Re:Omnisharp – Tools and extensions to work with C# in any e... by alkonaut on Thursday December 10, 2015 @10:01AM (#10710885)
I think I'd rather go for VS.code then, than try to bend Emacs or Sublime into doing C#.
Re:Omnisharp – Tools and extensions to work with C# in any e... by bsuh on Thursday December 10, 2015 @10:33AM (#10711078)
For what it's worth, VS.code uses omnisharp-roslyn for its C# integration. So you can get a very similar experience from editors which have omnisharp-roslyn support.
Re:Omnisharp – Tools and extensions to work with C# in any e... by moonchrome on Thursday December 10, 2015 @11:30AM (#10711467)
But VS code has project support and debugging integration AFAIK.

That's the kind of things that really set IDE vs editor in terms of usability.

Re:Omnisharp – Tools and extensions to work with C# in any e... by dasboth on Thursday December 10, 2015 @12:26PM (#10711876)
Interesting, apart from longish compile times on big projects I've never had speed issues. Installing Resharper, useful as it is, made it crawl so I abandonded it, but I feel productive in VS on its own.