Re:Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?
by kijin on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @09:12PM
(#10701442)
Notice that most of Wright's retroactive editing to make himself look like Satoshi took place in 2013-2014, shortly after Kleiman died.
Perhaps Kleiman was the one who really wanted to keep Satoshi's identity a secret, but Wright had different ambitions and now he doesn't have his friend to rein him in anymore.
Re:Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?
by o_nate on Wednesday December 09, 2015 @12:28PM
(#10705128)
Or Kleiman & Wright formed the Satoshi identity as a collaboration, and after Kleiman died, Wright decided to edit the historical record to take more of the credit for himself.
Re:Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?
by mmortal03 on Wednesday December 09, 2015 @06:02AM
(#10702996)
Well, according to one of the leaked e-mails, Wright originally wanted Kleiman's help in concealing his identity, but it's possible he could've changed his mind over time.
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--Oqntva_c...
Re:Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?
by perseusprime1 on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @10:06PM
(#10701663)
Possible. Kleiman seems to have stuck to not outing Satoshi at the expense of his own money problems.
Re:Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?
by astronautjones on Wednesday December 09, 2015 @01:57AM
(#10702320)
I think this is the most likely case.
Also in the Gawker article we are told Wright emailed Kleiman asking for "help editing a paper", "I need your help and I need a version of me to make this work that is better than me."