News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:China slams U.S. "information hegemony" by 1010011010 on Friday January 22, 2010 @11:08AM (#1069893)
"China's constitution protects the right of citizens to free speech"

Yeah... I'm sure it does.

Re:China slams U.S. "information hegemony" by est on Friday January 22, 2010 @02:04PM (#1070396)
The most ironic thing is if you copy paste the PRC Constitution law on any blog, forum even webmail in China, you'll fail to submit because the system will prompt you there's 'illegal keyword' in the content.

pic: http://i.imgur.com/XrGlR.jpg

Re:China slams U.S. "information hegemony" by sparky on Friday January 22, 2010 @11:42AM (#1069968)
Apparently true: http://www.usconstitution.net/china.html#Article35 Also, Article 41:

Citizens of the People's Republic of China have the right to criticize and make suggestions regarding any state organ or functionary. Citizens have the right to make to relevant state organs complaints or charges against, or exposures of, any state organ or functionary for violation of the law or dereliction of duty, but fabrication or distortion of facts for purposes of libel or false incrimination is prohibited.

The state organ concerned must deal with complaints, charges or exposures made by citizens in a responsible manner after ascertaining the facts. No one may suppress such complaints, charges and exposures or retaliate against the citizens making them.

It appears that the constitution states that people have these rights, but unfortunately it is the people who constitute the government of the time who protect (or disregard) rights, not a document. Actions speak louder than words.

Re:China slams U.S. "information hegemony" by adrih on Friday January 22, 2010 @12:16PM (#1070068)
The idea that the constitution shouldn't be too highly regarded even seems like a legitimate point to make in trials:

The charges stemmed from the CCP’s interpretation of Guo’s actions as subversive to its rule. His defense was not to dispute the evidence, but to argue that the published materials were not subversive, and that the constitution covers freedom of speech anyway. The prosecution asserted that the interests of the Party-State take priority.

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/27316/

Re:China slams U.S. "information hegemony" by dandelany on Friday January 22, 2010 @04:33PM (#1070739)
A judicial decision that states that "The interests of the Party-State take priority [over the Constitution]" seems legitimate to you? Are you being sarcastic?
Re:China slams U.S. "information hegemony" by adrih on Friday February 05, 2010 @05:35AM (#1103247)
No, I meant that the argument is legitimate in Chinese courts. It wouldn't be in Europe or in the US.
Re:China slams U.S. "information hegemony" by est on Friday January 22, 2010 @02:08PM (#1070401)
lol, no one gives a shit to constitution law in China. Countless official rules, regulations or 'TongZhi' violates constitution law directly.