Re:Mozilla’s newest app perfectly captures the ethical dilem...
by icebraining on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @12:23PM
(#10697826)
I don't understand that argument either; but no one is making it. First, filtering ads is not stealing. Secondly, nobody says content is owed - those companies are free not to provide it.
Re:Mozilla’s newest app perfectly captures the ethical dilem...
by thefastlane on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @12:49PM
(#10698005)
no one is 'stealing' anything and elevating the notion of adblocking from 'unethical' (it isn't) to 'theft' (which it definitely isn't) is exactly the sort of language-twisting that corporations attempt to employ and legitimise to where we don't even think about it.
as many others will explain on HN: i own my hardware; the code i choose to run or not run on my machine is my choice. got a problem with that? feel free to shut down your web site or put it behind a paywall. i have a whole shelf of books that i should be reading anyway rather than surfing the web. i won't miss your web site one bit. i promise.
Re:Mozilla’s newest app perfectly captures the ethical dilem...
by Lawtonfogle on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @12:34PM
(#10697903)
>I can't imagine feeling so entitled that I would argue that people owe me web and TV content.
I can't (ok, really I can, but I don't like to) imagine feeling so entitled that I would not only force someone else's computer to execute code at their detriment for my benefit, but then argue them selfish for deciding to limit what code I can get their computer to execute.
I really don't understand the argument that "I don't like how they want me to pay for this service; therefore it is ok to steal it"