News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Environment containers in GNU Guix by pmoriarty on Monday December 07, 2015 @09:20PM (#10694365)
"The container tools I'm working on are completely declarative. No imperative Dockerfiles! This means that you don't have to worry about order of operations, something that you have to think about constantly when using Docker, especially when trying to maximize the use of the image cache."

Sometimes you actually need or want something to be done before something else, though. I'm wondering how Guix deals with that, or if it's capable of dealing with that.

I've been bitten many times by Puppet's default lack of order in its declarative manifests. What was vaunted to be an advantage turned out to be a curse when you actually do want/need them to be in order.

I hope Guix does a better job at this than Puppet.

Re:Environment containers in GNU Guix by trishume on Monday December 07, 2015 @10:07PM (#10694517)
Basically it solves the problem a different way than you think. Instead of allowing you to control order, it removes the possibility of order mattering at the system level.

Nix and Guix use special file structures to make sure everything is isolated so no build can affect another, unless there is a depedency, in which case one will be built before the other.

It is this powerful isolated file structure that allows NixOS and GuixSD to deliver on the promise of deterministic system set up in a way Puppet and Chef will never be able to. It works incredibly well.