Re:NASA official warns private sector: We’re moving on from ...
by semi-extrinsic on Monday December 07, 2015 @05:11PM
(#10693133)
> The Space Shuttle was given to us by typical bureaucracy, and lies.
You forgot the military. They're e.g. the reason it has such big wings, because they wanted a huge single-orbit crossrange capability. Presumably for spying, maybe as a backup in case the Russians shot down a Keyhole or something.
Re:NASA official warns private sector: We’re moving on from ...
by _vk_ on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @10:40AM
(#10696971)
Not so. The crossrange capability was driven by the abort scenarios.
http://www.collectspace.com/ubb/Forum30/HTML/001340.html http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=4998.0
Re:NASA official warns private sector: We’re moving on from ...
by semi-extrinsic on Tuesday December 08, 2015 @01:44PM
(#10698410)
This is where I got the info: http://space.stackexchange.com/a/1400
Your sources seem more credible, but it's (obviously) hard to get concrete facts on military applications of the shuttle.
The Saturn was given to us by basically empowering a dictator to run the program and get things done, a lot like a CEO. The Space Shuttle was given to us by typical bureaucracy, and lies. Lots and lots of lies told with a straight face to the public.
I don't know that private companies can ever compete with NASA on the scale of spending, but given NASA's current relatively tiny budget, it doesn't seem out of the question.
And I like to daydream about a future where the space shuttle never happened and the Saturn XX single stage super rocket takes vacationers to the moon and then lands itself on its landing pad ready for a quick refuel and return trip.