Re:Schwarzenegger: I don’t give a damn if we agree about cli...
by Pharaoh2 on Monday December 07, 2015 @03:48PM
(#10692576)
So you are ok with 1* million(x) CO2 pollution deaths per year and 6 million(y) other pollution death per year?
*- Move the x as you want, and set y as (7 - x) million.
Re:Schwarzenegger: I don’t give a damn if we agree about cli...
by antod on Monday December 07, 2015 @04:49PM
(#10692992)
> Carbon dioxide != pollution
It's what plants crave!
Re:Schwarzenegger: I don’t give a damn if we agree about cli...
by tremols on Monday December 07, 2015 @04:50PM
(#10692999)
You americans must go beyond the false dichotomy of republicans and democrats.. its just two different ways of getting your tax money, weapons and staged wars or bureaucracy. Neither gives a damn about an african genocide to lower the price of chocolate.
Re:Schwarzenegger: I don’t give a damn if we agree about cli...
by Oletros on Monday December 07, 2015 @04:05PM
(#10692689)
You're mixing pollution with green house gases
Re:Schwarzenegger: I don’t give a damn if we agree about cli...
by merpnderp on Monday December 07, 2015 @04:09PM
(#10692714)
I think it's a valid point since the EPA labels CO2 as pollution.
[EDIT] Since I'm getting so many down votes, thought I'd link the EPA calling CO2 pollution. http://www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan
> First - do you believe it is acceptable that 7 million people die every year from pollution?
Answer this, how many of that 7 million year over year die from carbon dioxide?
This is the major issue with deniers. Carbon dioxide != pollution.
Edit:
I don't know anyone not in favor of clean energy. I know plenty who warn of government overreaching using climate change scare tactics.
You want to take a stance on pollution, then do that. Don't rant about climate change deniers.