News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Claimed proof of Riemann Hypothesis by throwa990323249 on Sunday December 06, 2015 @04:23PM (#10686685)
The paper addresses that directly:

"Thus, while our proof of RH might look too short to be true, it really involves at least two rather long papers [6, 8], not to mention [9]."

Re:Claimed proof of Riemann Hypothesis by knughit on Sunday December 06, 2015 @04:45PM (#10686783)
Strange, that sentence has already been rewritten.

I am surprised that in 30 years since [8] no one took another step toward the result in this new paper.