Why it’s so hard to keep up with how the U.S. gov't is spying on its own people

Re:Why it’s so hard to keep up with how the U.S. gov't is sp... by iamsohungry on Monday November 23, 2015 @11:40AM (#10615499)

I've said it before and I'll say it again: when law enforcement compromises the security of a network without a warrant, they need to be prosecuted and jailed under the same law that any other hackers breaking the law would be. As long as there are no consequences for breaking the law, the NSA will continue breaking the law.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why it’s so hard to keep up with how the U.S. gov't is sp... by cryoshon on Monday November 23, 2015 @11:46AM (#10615536)

The US has a long tradition of not jailing its political lawbreakers, though. The way they pitch immunity in this case is to claim that a prosecution of an NSA official that broke the law would cause the remaining NSA employees to be on-guard for lawbreaking, and too busy to watching their ass to do their job at the NSA effectively, leading to terrorist attacks against the US.

In effect, they say that it is unreasonable for us to expect the NSA to both obey the law and do their jobs.

Nevermind that they've re-written the laws to make their invasive surveillance completely legal.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why it’s so hard to keep up with how the U.S. gov't is sp... by iamsohungry on Monday November 23, 2015 @11:56AM (#10615589)

> The way they pitch immunity in this case is to claim that a prosecution of an NSA official that broke the law would cause the remaining NSA employees to be on-guard for lawbreaking,

Good. Government officials should be on guard for lawbreaking.

[ Parent | on HN ]