Re:MIT graduate student says income inequality is actually a...
by TheOtherHobbes on Thursday November 19, 2015 @09:41PM
(#10599264)
You can see this happening in London, which is in the middle of a useless government-supported property bubble.
Areas with prestige developments of > £20M houses and apartments are being left almost empty - because they're an investment, not a home.
What you're describing would essentially be a land and property tax. The idea is so shocking that proponents of both - like Henry George - literally tend to be written out of economic history.
The consequence of this assessment is very stark: People with money will continue to invest large chunk of their capital in real estate. The money invested in real estate is essentially "dead" because that money is locked up doing nothing, it doesn't work to produce goods, innovations or make world a better place. But real estate is indeed the most rewarding thing for your investments. So the thing is that behavior of real estate is completely against at odds with advancement of humanity. Real estate is in essence like cocaine of economy and there are no DEAs.
If these conclusions are right then it's huge problem. Goverments across the world should immediately take measure to discourage real estate possessions if you are not living there. Real estate should be placed in same category as food and water. We don't let wealthy hog up all the food and water and then inflate the prices for higher return on their capital. There can be progressive tax for the real estate properties you own but don't live at. Further, there should be national movement to aggressively create and encourage new housing . Without these measures, our economy is living on real estate cocaine with little productivity. I would wonder if our current limbo state of economy where nothing grows except real estate is precisely the manifestation of these issues.