News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Nanobox: Local development done right. Parent comment

Re:Nanobox: Local development done right by zeckalpha on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @07:40AM (#10587335)
That one's not unreasonable.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nanobox: Local development done right by grhmc on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @07:43AM (#10587347)
It seems I can't also specify a ruby runtime, though. What makes one reasonable and another not?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nanobox: Local development done right by sanderson1 on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @10:04AM (#10588055)
The mention of ruby in the description is a typo. There isn't a ruby runtime available in the generic python engine, but you're free to fork the engine and add the ruby runtime. All engines are open-source.
[ Parent | on HN ]