News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Nanobox: Local development done right. Parent comment

Re:Nanobox: Local development done right by grhmc on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @07:37AM (#10587324)
Later it says you can specify which JS runtime to use with python:

  build:
    runtime: python27
    js_runtime: nodejs-0.12
    app_module: ''
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nanobox: Local development done right by sanderson1 on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @10:02AM (#10588042)
The js_runtime is included because of the ubiquity of using tools like bower and gulp to compile assets, which require node.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nanobox: Local development done right by zeckalpha on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @07:40AM (#10587335)
That one's not unreasonable.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nanobox: Local development done right by grhmc on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @07:43AM (#10587347)
It seems I can't also specify a ruby runtime, though. What makes one reasonable and another not?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nanobox: Local development done right by sanderson1 on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @10:04AM (#10588055)
The mention of ruby in the description is a typo. There isn't a ruby runtime available in the generic python engine, but you're free to fork the engine and add the ruby runtime. All engines are open-source.
[ Parent | on HN ]