Re:Introducing the new Google+
by bitwize on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @05:40PM
(#10584536)
Designers from San Francisco, that's who. Current design trends favor "negative space", so text has to be spaced widely, with huge margins and hairsbreadth-thin fonts.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Negative space is always useful. Simply spacing shit out to create low information density isn't the same thing. Adding a bunch of unnecessary dividers (cards and shadows) are definitely not the same thing as negative space.
Negative space would be allowing the space between items to create a division instead of the borders and shadows.
You forgot to mention the very low cost, especially for font because we gotta hide that pesky content that we have to show after all.
Re:Introducing the new Google+
by alexschleber on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @05:00PM
(#10591082)
Images (even small, low-quality ones) are far more costly than text, no?
Re:Introducing the new Google+
by nosuchthing on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @07:53PM
(#10585173)
The saying "Form follows function." is well ingrained among industrial designers, UI designers ought consider it as well.
Although my assumption here is front end designers are often subjected to death by a thousand revisions from 'the suits'.