News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Osborne’s National Spider Plan – Replacing “cyber” with “... by jerf on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @11:58AM (#10582363)
"And so inspired by Jennie Rigg’s brilliant tweet, here are extracts from George Osborne’s speech today, with “cyber” replaced with “spider”.

And it makes just as much sense."

No it doesn't. That's crazy. "Spiderspace"? The term "cyberspace" may be prone to abuse but it does mean something. "Cyber security" means something real. "Cyber-age" means something real. I'd prefer "computer" for the latter two, but it doesn't change the fact that "computer/cyber security" is a real problem. Nobody's going to hack into a spider and break all your grid electrical generators by over-revving them.

This is clearly just "I don't like X therefore all negative claims about X must be true". The claim that this speech makes just as much sense is so transparently ludicrous I can't imagine where else it comes from.

Re:Osborne’s National Spider Plan – Replacing “cyber” with “... by Roboprog on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @12:04PM (#10582415)
Like most political speeches, it's lacking details. Replacing the threat name is funny because the vagueness still fits.
Re:Osborne’s National Spider Plan – Replacing “cyber” with “... by Roboprog on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @12:13PM (#10582483)
I'm surprised this comment was upvoted. I considered it a "PSA from Captain Obvious"
Re:Osborne’s National Spider Plan – Replacing “cyber” with “... by jerf on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @04:09PM (#10583964)
It would be far more effective to replace it with "public transportation" or something... except then it would be far more obvious that it doesn't work. Yes, it's a political speech, but no, it's not that vague.
Re:Osborne’s National Spider Plan – Replacing “cyber” with “... by pjc50 on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @04:15PM (#10584002)
cyberspace actually means something

What does it mean exactly? It's not a real place. It's a term from pre-mass-internet science fiction. It's not a term of art. It's not how people in the business talk about it. Talking about "cyber-" is nearly always a giveaway that somone doesn't know what they're talking about.

Computer security, yes. Or information security.

Part of the problem is that the UK government is trying to pass a law to enable their own use of "targeted equipment interference", i.e. state sponsored hacking. This prevents us having an honest conversation about who is defending against whom and how.

We could really do with a "cyber" Geneva convention globally prohibiting the use or secret development of hacking tools by governments against civilians, including their own civilians.

Re:Osborne’s National Spider Plan – Replacing “cyber” with “... by wdmeldon on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @01:04PM (#10582842)
You're clearly just not living in the spider-age like the rest of us.
Re:Osborne’s National Spider Plan – Replacing “cyber” with “... by spacecowboy_lon on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @12:09PM (#10582447)
Exactly I suspect that Jack came late to computers and like all new enthusiasts get caught up in terminology.

Cyber is a trendy cliche but its a useful shorthand to the problem area.

Re:Osborne’s National Spider Plan – Replacing “cyber” with “... by fulafel on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @02:21PM (#10583353)
Actually "Cybernetics is a transdisciplinary[1] approach for exploring regulatory systems, their structures, constraints, and possibilities." (WP)