News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jessica Livingston by brchsiao on Monday November 16, 2015 @03:28PM (#10576925)
Please reread the essay. She was not "a girlfriend with an English degree" he "brought on to handle marketing."

> Y Combinator is fundamentally a nexus of people, like a university. It doesn't make a product. What defines it is the people. Jessica more than anyone curated and nurtured that collection of people. In that sense she literally made YC.

You seem to be assuming that pg wrote this essay to boost YC's reputation. Actually it feels like he wrote it to correct an injustice. A large one, I'd add, considering it's gone on for most of a decade.

Re:Jessica Livingston by tedks on Monday November 16, 2015 @03:34PM (#10576959)
Yes, I think the comment-parents point is that it doesn't really speak well of YC, and so doesn't really address any injustice.`
Re:Jessica Livingston by dang on Monday November 16, 2015 @06:45PM (#10578192)
That comment merely repeats the injustice, in a weird and creepy internet way. Fortunately users flagged it.
Re:Jessica Livingston by tedks on Monday November 16, 2015 @10:29PM (#10578999)
Well, I suppose it's your job to defend YC and remove anything that reflects badly on them on this particular social media platform, but I'll just have to say that I found pg's essay very patronizing and misogynistic. It did not do anything to make YC appear more "diverse" or feminist in my view and if anything did the opposite.

The only thing that's weird and creepy about this entire thing is the rampant misogyny and anti-feminism in the entirety of the tech community and the central dogma that literal tokenism can solve these problems.

Re:Jessica Livingston by dang on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @02:34AM (#10579683)
That's not my job, nor did I remove anything.

That you denounce an essay giving Jessica credit for her work as "patronizing and misogynistic" while defending a comment that was not only both of those things but cartoonishly so, probably takes the cake for this thread.

Re:Jessica Livingston by tedks on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @09:23PM (#10585512)
> That's not my job, nor did I remove anything.

Potato potato, as they say.

>that was not only both of those things but cartoonishly so, probably takes the cake for this thread.

I think you're misreading the comment parent, which summarizes the gist of the article and points out that the reading most people will get at first tack is not very charitable towards Jessica. I agree with the comment parent that the article is quite tone-deaf. The whole "she was the mom of the group" is just plain cringeworthy.

You seem to be reading the comment parent as if he's saying "big deal, she was just his girlfriend" but what he's actually saying is, saying "she was a great mom to all of us" is a horrifically tone-deaf anti-feminist statement.

I could be wrong of course but that's my charitable interpretation of the comment parent. It's almost exactly the comment I came here to write, so if the author's intentions are different it's hard for me to see that past the surface-level obviousness of what they're saying.

[dead]
Re:Jessica Livingston by nostrademons on Monday November 16, 2015 @03:42PM (#10576996)
That's not what the article says:

"Jessica and I decided one night to start it, and the next day we recruited my friends Robert Morris and Trevor Blackwell."

At least in the article, it's pretty clear that they decided to start the company together, and then brought on a couple other friends. (I've read elsewhere that the actual story was more like Jessica was looking for jobs at VC firms, the VCs were dragging their feet, and so PG was like "Fuck it. We'll start our own.")

"Brought her on to handle marketing at YC" is something you're injecting into the text, it's not anything that they wrote.

Re:Jessica Livingston by brchsiao on Monday November 16, 2015 @03:42PM (#10577001)
What do you find tone deaf about it? I'm unable to extract this message from the essay: "No, really, my girlfriend was around to be the work mom and handle the social stuff!" It reads more to me like "despite all she's accomplished, the press is never going to do her justice, and if no one's going to, I will."